Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2010-04-16 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2010-04-16 Senate Journal Page 2387 SB 110 Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the concur message on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 110(FIN) "An Act relating to the preservation of evidence and to the DNA identification system" which had been held on the Secretary's desk (page 2363) be taken up at this time. Without objection, it was so ordered. 2010-04-16 Senate Journal Page 2388 Senator Ellis moved that the Senate concur in the House amendment. The question being: "Shall the Senate concur in the House amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 110(FIN) Shall the Senate Concur in the House Amendment to CSSB 110(FIN)? Crt Rule Eff Date YEAS: 19 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Coghill, Dyson, Egan, Ellis, French, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Menard, Meyer, Olson, Paskvan, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wagoner, Wielechowski Excused: Davis and so, the Senate concurred in the House amendment, thus adopting HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 110(FIN) "An Act relating to post-conviction DNA testing, to the preservation of certain evidence, and to the DNA identification registration system; relating to post-conviction relief procedures; relating to representation by the public defender; amending Rule 35.1, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date." Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the concurrence be considered the vote on the Court Rule change. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on concurrence be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. The Secretary was requested to notify the House. The bill was referred to the Secretary for enrollment.